MIRARCO: your solutions partner for mining and the environment.
 
  HOME    SITE MAP    SEARCH    CONTACT 
 
      ABOUT MIRARCO
      ENVIRONMENT
      MINING TECH
      GEOMECHANICS
      EXPLORATION
      PRODUCTS
      FACILITIES
      CAREERS
      STAFF

      SHORT COURSES
      SEMINARS
      GRAD STUDENTS
      PRESS
      VIRTUAL REALITY

      HIGHLIGHTS
      COMMUNITY SUPPORT
      TESTIMONIALS
Geomechanics Research Centre Projects

Field and Laboratory evaluation of shotcrete performance

The use of shotcrete in Canadian hardrock mines has experienced rapid growth over the past 10 to 15 years. In some cases the introduction of shotcrete has helped to extend the mine life or has reduced rehabilitation costs and production delays. While shotcrete is now accepted as a viable support option, there is increasing evidence that better guidelines are needed to ensure appropriate (cost-effective) selection and application of different types of shotcrete in widely differing underground environments.

The Geomechanics Research Centre has been involved in numerous field and laboratory investigations of shotcrete performance and is working towards establishing guidelines to assist the mining industry in selecting the most appropriate type of shotcrete or support system for a given application.

A zone of failed rock usually develops around excavations at depth or in highly stressed ground. This failing rock dilates and bulks in volume as it fails. Support systems designed to control the failure process and to maintain stability and safety in the excavation must be able to accommodate these deformations. Hence, much of GRC's testing has focused on the performance of shotcrete under large imposed displacements.

Loading of the shotcrete may occur very rapidly in rockburst situations or gradually over time when progressive failure processes dominate the rockmass response near the excavation. From numerous tests on shotcrete with various loading rates (pull tests, impact tests, and explosive loading) much needed data about the capacities of shotcrete under field and large-scale testing conditions has been generated. Some of the findings include:

  • Contrary to results from tests on small-scale shotcrete beams, GRC has found that mesh-reinforced shotcrete offers more toughness and higher load carrying capacity than steel-fibre reinforced shotcrete at very large imposed displacements.
  • Preventing excessive tangential stresses in the shotcrete is necessary for optimal shotcrete performance in excavations that will experience large convergence or closure after the shotcrete is applied.
  • Shotcrete can retain its functionality near large production blasts. Shotcrete (plain, steel fibre, or mesh reinforced) can survive peak particle velocities in the order of 1 to 2 m/s as long as the underlying rock is not forcibly ejected into the excavation and the shotcrete is applied as panels that are not highly stressed.
  • The addition of shotcrete to mesh greatly improves the mesh's load carrying capacity and results in a retaining component that has superior energy absorption properties.

Pull test on shotcrete

Impact test on shotcrete panels
GRC plans further testing to evaluate shotcrete performance. Other areas of interest include the abrasion and impact resistance of shotcrete for use in ore passes and storage bins, comparative evaluation of shotcrete, Mineguard and new types of fibre-reinforced shotcrete, and development of procedures for designing shotcrete-based support systems for different applications. Our research will also focus on developing better tools for predicting the demand (load, displacement, and energy) that may be placed on shotcrete for specific excavation geometries, stress levels, and rockmass conditions.


Copyright© 2004 MIRARCO
A not-for-profit corporation of
Laurentian University

Last modified: August 15 2005.